Blog

Comparing Annex A in ISO/IEC 27001:2013 vs. ISO/IEC 27001:2022

I wrote ages ago this article, where I compared briefly the Annex A in the two versions of the standard: https://www.sorinmustaca.com/annex-a-of-iso-27001-2022-explained/ But, I feel that there is still need to detail a bit the changes, especially that now more and more business are forced to re-audit for the newer standard.   Overview of Annex A […]

NIS2 Fulfillment through TISAX Assessment and ISA6

ENX has released an interesting article about how NIS2 requirements map to TISAX requirements. For this, there is a short introductory article called “TISAX and Cybersecurity in Industry – Expert Analysis Confirms NIS2 Coverage” and and a full article of 75 pages : https://enx.com/TISAX-NIS2-en.pdf An analysis conducted within ENX’s expert working groups examined how well […]

Guide for delivering frequently software features that matter (series) #2/2: Challenges and the path forward

Click below for the podcast version (AI generated): https://www.sorinmustaca.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/Guide-for-delivering-2.mp3 Challenges that stop teams to deliver and how to solve them Objection 1: “Our features are too complex for short sprints” This is the most common objection I hear, and it reveals a fundamental misunderstanding. The solution isn’t longer sprints or more sprints — it’s better […]

Guide for delivering frequently software features that matter (series) #1/2: the Pillars of successful frequent delivery

Click below for the podcast version (AI generated): https://www.sorinmustaca.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/guide-for-delivering-1.mp3 Guide for delivering frequently software features that matter: the three Pillars of successful frequent delivery If you’re a software engineer older than 30 years, then you definitely have worked following a non-agile methodology. Those methodologies are based on a fixed structure, a lot of planning, and […]

Guide for delivering frequently software features that matter (series)

If you’re a software engineer older than 30 years, then you definitely have worked following a non-agile methodology. Those methodologies are based on a fixed structure, a lot of planning, and hope that everything will go as planned. And they never worked   Small bets, less risk After helping many teams transform their delivery approach […]